EShopExplore

Location:HOME > E-commerce > content

E-commerce

Why Are TASMAC Outlets in Chennai Charging 50-200 Extra on MRP on Liquor?

January 07, 2025E-commerce4803
Why Are TASMAC Outlets in Chennai Charging 50-200 Extra on MRP on Liqu

Why Are TASMAC Outlets in Chennai Charging 50-200 Extra on MRP on Liquor?

In a recent investigation, it was discovered that TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) outlets in Chennai are charging an extra of 50 to 200 rupees above the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) on liquor. This practice raises several questions about governance, transparency, and the application of the law.

Understanding the Issue

The Government of Tamil Nadu is governed by parties that have made significant promises and declarations yet fail to deliver on their commitments. This current state of affairs is concerning, to say the least. The prohibition of alcohol sales is not effectively enforced, and the ban is only applicable within city limits, which inadvertently benefits black marketers. Additionally, the ongoing lockdown has not brought down the number of affected cases, leading to the exploitation of the public health department.

The core issue at hand is the discrepancy between the law and its implementation. According to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, it is illegal to sell any product above its Maximum Retail Price (MRP). Manufacturers are required to clearly mention the MRP, and retailers are prohibited from selling at a price higher than the listed MRP. This ensures fair trade and protects consumers from being overcharged.

The Mysterious 'Mamool'

When the matter was addressed to the sellers, they claimed that they had to pay a 'mamool' (a bribe) to local goons and the police, with the funds eventually reaching the top levels of the administration. This practice is not only illegal but also corrupt. The money paid in these forms is used to influence and control the supply chain at every level.

Legal Penalties and Implications

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 stipulates strict penalties for violators. For a first offense, the penalty can be up to Rs 50,000, and for subsequent offenses, it can extend to a fine of up to Rs 100,000 or a year of imprisonment, or both. These measures are meant to deter illegal practices and ensure that consumers are not unfairly disadvantaged.

Given that TASMAC is a government enterprise, it is crucial that the minister in charge and his immediate subordinates are penalized for such transparent violations of the law. It is evident that the governance in Tamil Nadu needs restructuring and a more transparent approach to ensure fair trade and public welfare.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

The practice of charging extra MRP on liquor in TASMAC outlets in Chennai is a significant indicator of the systemic issues within the government. It reflects a lack of transparency, corruption, and ineffective governance. The government must take immediate action to address these violations and implement a more robust regulatory framework to protect and serve the public interest.

Consumers should remain vigilant and report such practices to the authorities. The government should also conduct thorough investigations into these incidents and take legal action against those responsible. It is the duty of the government to ensure that the law is not only written but also effectively enforced to protect the rights and interests of all citizens.