Why the Age to Purchase Tobacco has Been Raised and Why More People Aren't Upset

The recent increase in the legal age to purchase tobacco has been a topic of discussion and debate. However, it seems that many individuals are unaware of this change or remain largely indifferent to it. This article explores the reasons behind this lack of outrage and discusses the broader implications of such legislation.

Understanding the Raise in Tobacco Age

The adjustment of the legal age to purchase tobacco has been a gradual process in many countries. While some have implemented it at 18, attempts to raise it to 21 or higher are becoming more prevalent. The rationale behind this change typically centers on the health and social implications of tobacco use among young people.

Proponents argue that raising the age can reduce the initiation of tobacco use among adolescents and young adults, thereby lowering the overall prevalence of smoking and associated health risks. However, the lack of public uproar raises several intriguing questions about public awareness and the effectiveness of such measures.

Why Not More Outrage?

One of the primary reasons for the lack of outrage is the sheer ignorance of many individuals regarding this change. News consumption patterns and the media's focus on other issues might contribute to this phenomenon. Furthermore, social media algorithms tend to prioritize sensational or controversial content, which can overshadow important but less dramatic legislative changes.

In addition, the views of libertarians and those who prioritize personal freedoms have historically opposed government intervention in individual choices. Libertarians see this change as an infringement on personal autonomy and a shift towards a more authoritarian state. Consequently, fewer vocal protests might simply indicate lower public engagement with the issue.

The Libertarian Perspective and Its Relevance

Libertarians strongly advocate for minimal government intervention in personal decisions. As one libertarian succinctly put it, 'Give me liberty or give me death' and 'Live Free or Die'. From this perspective, any measure that restricts personal freedoms is viewed with suspicion and opposition.

For many libertarians, the raise in the tobacco purchase age is seen as a misguided attempt at prohibition, which has historically proven ineffective. Proponents argue that such policies could be better directed towards education, public health campaigns, and regulation rather than outright bans. This viewpoint aligns with the libertarian belief in personal responsibility and free choice.

The Broader Implications of Government Prohibition

Prohibitionist policies, like those targeting tobacco, often lead to unintended consequences. Some of the most significant issues include:

Black Market and Cartel Empowerment: Implementing strict regulations can create artificial scarcity, driving products underground and empowering illegal organizations that benefit from their sales. Health Risks and Fentanyl Overdoses: Criminalizing substances often leads to the circulation of adulterated products. In the case of fentanyl, unmonitored drug use can result in catastrophic health outcomes. Protection of Vulnerable Populations: Policies that criminalize drug use can discourage individuals from seeking necessary medical help, leading to worsening health conditions. Violent Crime and Child Protection: Increased involvement in the black market can lead to increased violent crime and putting vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women with drug-related health issues, at risk of exploitation and harm.

While raising the age to purchase tobacco may appear as a step in the right direction for public health, the broader implications of such policies must be carefully considered. The unintended consequences often outweigh the intended benefits, especially when such measures do not align with fundamental principles of personal freedom and responsibility.

Conclusion

The lack of public outrage over the raise in the tobacco purchase age is a reflection of the current societal indifference or lack of awareness regarding this change. From the libertarian perspective, such measures are seen as an infringement on personal freedoms and are viewed with suspicion. However, the broader implications of government prohibition policies highlight the need for a more nuanced approach that balances public health with personal autonomy.